JUST A MISTAKE?
Polish Americans have been complaining
about descriptions such as "Polish concentration camps" and "Polish
death camps" for years now. At first we assumed these were just
mistakes made by the uninformed, confused or simply ignorant. Later,
we began to get concerned and suspect that there just might be some
animosity involved.
Today, I have less doubt. Surely,
anyone who writes about "Polish" concentration or death camps is
either a bigot or a moron. Considering that reporters and columnists
are generally well educated and reasonably intelligent, I would vote
for "bigot," except that it is too simple an explanation and does
reach to the roots of the problem.
Recently an article in the widely
circulated Parade magazine referred to concentration camps
and the ghetto in Warsaw as being Polish. Well, there should no
longer be any need to explain that they may have been situated in
Poland, but characterizing them as Polish is a major historical
error. There is no excuse for any educated person not knowing that
these places were created and managed by the Germans. On an equal
par is hiding the true identity of the perpetrators by constantly
referring to them as "Nazis." Described only as Nazis, the
uninformed reader, particularly the young not familiar with the
history of World War II, might easily assume them to be Polish. That
is misinformation by misdirection.
Mistakes or purposeful? Again, it is
difficult to believe that it is merely error. Just sloppy reporting?
If so, it is still inexcusable and would not be tolerated by editors
in any other situations.
The Parade article was written
by a gentleman named Blumenthal. It may not be politically correct
to mention that this writer has a typically Jewish name, but it is
factual. The point is made here only because the description of
German camps and ghettos as Polish is too often made by Jewish
writers. Poles have ignored stating this because we do not want to
be equally guilty of the bigotry apparently evidenced by those
authors. Ignoring the truth, however, does not help to rectify a
wrongful situation. Sometimes, regardless of how hard it may be,
reality must be faced head on.
There are reasons why Jewish writers
may tend to think of German crimes on Polish soil to be actually the
work of Poles. Those motivations may not bestow total innocence upon
the writers, but they do account somewhat for the incorrect
descriptions.
To some extent, the reason may be seen
as "hereditary," not in the physical, but the psychological, sense.
Young Jews were often taught that the transgressions were Polish,
either by intentional falsehoods or by carelessly defined
statements. Polish guilt is, therefore, deeply ingrained in some
persons from their youth and difficult to correct even by education
and investigation. It is not easy to erase the lessons taught on the
knee of one’s grandfather.
German Jews, such as those with
Germanic names like Blumenthal, considered themselves superior to
Slavic Jews, just as other Germans claimed superiority over all
Slavs. There has always been a love-hate relationship between German
Jews and other Germans, so it was not difficult to ascribe the
offenses within Polish borders to the residents rather than the
German occupiers. Recall the difficult truth that Jews initially
refused to believe that the German population could commit
atrocities against them and resisted leaving what they considered to
also be their fatherland.
The foregoing is explored here
primarily as a part of the difficult task of perfecting
Polish-Jewish relations. If some Jews have inaccurately described
the events of WWII, some Poles have also incorrectly portrayed the
history of Jews in Poland. Both sides have to discard old concepts
and look anew at each other, and their mutual history. Only then
will false statements disappear.